Doctors, lawyers, and patients: three's a crowd.
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
بررسی معیارهای منطقی در تدوین منشور حقوق بیماران
In recent years many considerations have been considered in order to protect the rights of patients. Studying patients' rights can be seen as an observance of the basic values of human rights, such as respect for individuals on which the rights of patients are based. Rights of patients reflect medical rights and human rights, and the basis for improving patients' health.In Iran's Islamic penal ...
متن کاملPatients and Their Doctors a Study of General Practice
Two's company, three's none, or so they say. The relationship between general practice and its other two bedfellows in the National Health Service (local health authority and hospital divisions) has always been an uneasy one. Recently much attention has been given to diagnosis of the malaise that afflicts the family doctor service, hampers recruitment to its ranks, and leads to eruption of disc...
متن کاملWhat doctors feel: how emotions affect the practice of medicine.
In this book of real-life stories intermixed with the latest research, Dr. Danielle Ofri examines the often overlooked aspect of medicine—how doctors feel. By shedding light on how doctors cope with the stresses and responsibilities of patients, colleagues, lawyers, and their personal lives, she explains why it is important that patients know how emotions influence the way physicians treat thei...
متن کاملWho Says Three's a Crowd? Using a Cognitive Tutor to Support Peer Tutoring
Adding student collaboration to an intelligent tutoring system could leverage the benefits of both approaches. We have incorporated a mutual peer tutoring script, where students of similar abilities take turns tutoring each other, into the Cognitive Tutor Algebra. In this paper, we identify three design principles for peer tutoring, and discuss how they were realized in our peer tutoring script...
متن کاملUnderstanding the First Malpractice Crisis of the 21st Century
Professional liability insurance crises in medicine have been intermittent, reaching magnitudes sucient to generate widespread concern only in the mid-1970s, the mid-1980s, and 2002-2003. It is easy for health policymakers and the public to view each crisis as an upswing of the same pendulum. Malpractice premiums rise, doctors accuse lawyers, lawyers point back at doctors, and legislatures deb...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Connecticut medicine
دوره 77 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013